This volume, published by the Bodleian Library of Oxford University (and showcasing some of their holdings of Kenneth Grahame's manuscripts), is a very attractive and nicely illustrated account of the origins and publication of Kenneth Grahame's classic, The Wind in the Willows. There isn't much more to say about it, just that if you like this kind of book (as I do), this one is well-done and engaging.
Monday, July 23, 2018
Monday, July 16, 2018
Le Guin's Last Words
Ursula K. Le Guin corrected the proofs of this small book just one week before her death in January 2018 at the age of 88. It is called Ursula K. Le Guin: Conversations on Writing. It began as conversations with David Naimon at a small community radio station in Portland, Oregon, where Le Guin lived. The book version of these conversations is divided into three main sections: "On Fiction," "On Poetry," and "On Nonfiction."
All three parts are interesting, though the one on poetry is on a foreign ground for me. Nothing seems out of place if you have read Le Guin's nonfiction, particularly her recent collection Words Are My Matter (2016), which is referenced often in section three.
All in all this is a pleasant coda to a long and distinguished career.
All three parts are interesting, though the one on poetry is on a foreign ground for me. Nothing seems out of place if you have read Le Guin's nonfiction, particularly her recent collection Words Are My Matter (2016), which is referenced often in section three.
All in all this is a pleasant coda to a long and distinguished career.
Wednesday, July 11, 2018
The World Turned Upside-Down
The first words I read by Junot Diaz were his supposed confession of having been raped as a child, published in the April 16, 2018 issue of The New Yorker. All the Holden Caulfield bells went off in my mind: Phoney! Sexual assault is charge to be taken seriously, but in this case it seemed that Diaz was making a generic and contrived complaint, one that just didn't (for me) ring true. Soon afterwards some charges against Diaz himself of sexual abuse surfaced, which made his "confession" seem even more like a calculated pre-emptive strike for sympathy. Be that as it may, I thought I'd give one of his books a read, and by most accounts the book to read was his novel The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao (2007). It won the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction and the National Book Critics Circle Award. Well I'm now completely baffled as to why this book won any award at all. It's a poorly written account of the sad (and not short enough) life of a Dominican geek in New Jersey, with the author sneering at his characters all of the time. If something as repulsive as MTV's Jersey Shore had been based on a novel, then the novel would share a kinship with The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao.
After struggling to get through Diaz's book, what a great pleasure to read The Uncertainty of All Earthly Things (2018), a short story collection by British writer Mark Valentine. It contains twelve stories, all originally published in small press sources between 2013 and 2017, plus a section "Notes on the Border" comprising some diary entries from 2001 through 2003. There is more talent and artistry in a few pages of Valentine's prose than could be found in an entire novel by Diaz. The Uncertainty of All Earthly Things was published in a limited edition of 199 numbered copies. Why is there such a disparity, and one in the wrong direction, between the receptions of Diaz and Valentine? Valentine is a literary writer, while Diaz is schlockmeister of the tee-vee generation. It's a sad world that Diaz is acclaimed while Valentine is read only by the cognioscenti.
After struggling to get through Diaz's book, what a great pleasure to read The Uncertainty of All Earthly Things (2018), a short story collection by British writer Mark Valentine. It contains twelve stories, all originally published in small press sources between 2013 and 2017, plus a section "Notes on the Border" comprising some diary entries from 2001 through 2003. There is more talent and artistry in a few pages of Valentine's prose than could be found in an entire novel by Diaz. The Uncertainty of All Earthly Things was published in a limited edition of 199 numbered copies. Why is there such a disparity, and one in the wrong direction, between the receptions of Diaz and Valentine? Valentine is a literary writer, while Diaz is schlockmeister of the tee-vee generation. It's a sad world that Diaz is acclaimed while Valentine is read only by the cognioscenti.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)